A score of 13–20 indicates moderate Internet addiction, which implies that your relationship with the Internet is causing you “occasional or frequent problems.” A score between 21 and 25 suggests severe Internet addiction, and implies that the Internet is causing “significant problems in your life. A score of 8–12 suggests mild Internet addiction-you may spend too long on the web sometimes, but you’re generally in control of your usage. “Internet Addiction Test Select the response that best represents the frequency of each behavior listed using the scale below: 0 = Not applicable 1 = Rarely 2 = Occasionally 3 = Frequently 4 = Often 5 = Always How often do you find that you stay online longer than you intended? _ How often do others in your life complain to you about the amount of time you spend online? _ How often do you check your email before something else that you need to do? _ How often do you lose sleep because of late night log-ins? _ How often do you find yourself saying “just a few minutes” when online? _ If you scored 7 or below, you show no signs of Internet addiction. Incredibly, the students claimed they reached their decision fairly in both situations, but only the students who sat in front of a mirror actually obeyed the outcome of the coin toss.”ĭrunk Tank Pink: And Other Unexpected Forces That Shape How We Think, Feel, and Behave First up, NYU associate professor Adam Alter showed how exploiting a simple human trait could actually make us. In his book Irresistible, academician Adam Alter argues that the obsessive use of smartphones and other devices for social media is a manifestation of behavioural addiction, that is. On Tuesday night, five speakers in TED’s New York office shared a salon that explored the hidden opportunities, truths and humor in these split-second assumptions. Irresistible: The Rise of Addictive Technology and the Business of Keeping Us Hooked by Adam Alter 10,815 ratings, 3. Forced to stare at their reflections as they tossed the coin, the students were perfectly fair, assigning their phantom partner to the positive task exactly 50 percent of the time. First impressions are full of promise and anxiety. The researchers tried the task again, this time placing the students in front of a large mirror. Since they weren’t supervised, you can imagine how the students interpreted a negative outcome: if they lost the first toss, perhaps they decided that the outcome should rest on a best-of-three scenario. Though all of the students tossed the coin, the researchers found that 85 percent of the students assigned themselves to the positive task, suggesting that the coin was merely a prop that allowed them to defend the fairness of the desired outcome. The laws of probability state that if the students were using the coins fairly, roughly half of them should have been assigned to the positive task, and the other half should have been assigned to the negative task. “Obviously the students preferred to assign themselves to the appealing task and their partners to the unappealing task, but they also recognized that it would be fairer to toss a coin to decide who would undertake each task.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |